The H Group Blog

Investment and Financial Planning news from some of the best in the business.

What does the Fed mean when it talks about reducing its balance sheet?

Question of the Week - April 10, 2017

Website Administrator - Monday, April 10, 2017

What does the Fed mean when it talks about reducing its balance sheet?

In the course of its regular operations, the Federal Reserve maintains a balance sheet of assets and liabilities, which is meaningful for government accounting purposes, and, more tangibly, to serve as a vehicle for holding U.S. treasury bonds that are bought and sold during the Fed’s routine open market operations (which serve the key function of interest rate targeting). Since the financial crisis when quantitative easing was put into place through the massive purchase of treasuries, this asset bucket has also held agency mortgage debt, in an effort to help stabilize home finance markets in the wake of the widespread breakdown of housing prices and well-publicized issues with mortgage underwriting quality.

Since 2008, this balance sheet has grown to $4.5 trillion, or nearly a quarter of U.S. GDP, in contrast to just over 5% prior to the financial crisis, around where it had been for a few decades. The bulk of assets held are treasury debt, but also, since 2008, agency mortgages, which were purchased for similar reasons and to help with liquidity in the Fed role of lender of ‘last resort’, to push interest rates downward and ease financial conditions generally, during and since the financial crisis. Now, the difficult question is how to unload these bonds and shrink the balance sheet back down to a normal size. A likely, and less intrusive approach, would be to either gradually or abruptly stop reinvesting proceeds from maturing bonds into new debt, which would to allow it to shrink naturally. A less likely, and arguably more dramatic and destabilizing approach, would be to actually sell some of these bond holdings. Due to the Fed’s role as largest holder of these bonds, it’s quite possible sales would saturate the market with supply—pushing down prices and pulling up interest rates—more sharply and quickly than policymakers intend.

There is a careful balance here, in gracefully shrinking a very large portfolio of bond holdings, but not doing so in a manner that generates a variety of negative side effects. Regardless, there is a higher likelihood now that this process may begin later this year (this is one of those things that has been swept under the rug for so long, some investors perhaps hoped it would never be dealt with). But paring back the size of holdings is a healthy and necessary move in the long run—it gives the Fed more ammunition to deal with future crises and potential needs for more quantitative easing, and helps treasury and agency markets gradually return to some semblance of ‘normal’ with more natural market dynamics and ‘float’, although this could still take some time. In fact, due to the large amounts involved, some economists estimate that this balance sheet unwinding could take up to 10-20 years.

Another component in the implementation is how this is all communicated, which was also discussed in the minutes to some extent. Markets have been increasingly focused on tone and key words used when Fed officials have written or spoken about these issues in recent years—as much so or more than the actions themselves. Expect much more media discussion of the topic in coming months.

Read our Weekly Review for April 10, 2017.

Read the previous Question of the Week for March 13, 2017.

Trackback Link
http://www.thehgroup.com/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=17607&PostID=1494050&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.

Recent Posts


Tags

Weekly Review Government regulation PPI Trade Balance Financial Planning Fed Note Gold Retail Sales Insurance Building Permits Trade Deficit Consumer Price Index Home Sales Weekly Hours Quarterly Reports Spending FHFA Millennials GDP Fun Medicare Goods Trade Balance Consumer Sentiment NFIB International Monetary Fund Retirement Planning Labor Costs Nonfarm productivity Conference Board Obamacare Brexit NAHB Account Balance Year In Review The Economy Factory Orders Durable Goods Risk Management Business Inventories Hourly Earnings Average Earnings Taxes Continuing Claims NASDAQ Industrial Production ISM Question of the Week Home Price Inflation Our Team Members General Nonfarm payroll Unemployment Rate Consumer Confidence ADP Employment Equity Europe JOLT The National Debt Philly Fed Global Markets FOMC Bonds Payrolls Quarterly Updates Dow Jones Bitcoins Helpful Hints Investment Planning Employment Elections Financial Markets Producer Price Index Scotland In the News The Eurozone Currencies Import Prices University of Michigan Empire State Manufacturing Interest Rates Politics The Stock Market Chicago PMI Weather, Gas Prices Housing Starts Education Planning Tax Inversion Fed Beige Book Health Insurance Case-Shiller Average Workweek Debt The Budget Deficit Unit Labor Costs Wholesale Inventories Jobless Claims Portfolio Management Income Estate Planning Capacity Utilization Construction Spending Euro Economy Personal consumption expenditures Fiscal Cliff Vehicle Sales Fiduciary Rule Money Market IPO The Fed MBA Mortgage Index Economic Indicators Social Security

Archive